Abstract: Facing the transformation of national spatial planning, this paper attempts to explore the GI or ecological space planning systems appropriate to China's contexts by comparing the GI planning cases of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany. It has been found that the GI planning system of Germany is comparatively complete. The GI planning of America is rather complete in  certain cities under the background of urban renewal; while the GI of the United Kingdom pays more attention to rural characteristic protection. The complexity of geographical conditions and urban-rural structures in China indicates the necessity to distinguish and learn from different foreign systems. This paper puts forward the following suggestions for the development of China's GI planning: conceptually,  it's necessary to appreciate the multi-functionality of comprehensive values of natural resources; institutionally, China should draw on the experiences of the German GI to construct legal support based on the inherent value of natural resources, and then conduct the GI or ecological space planning system, methods and mapping specifications at different scales; methodologically, it's important to distinguish the differences between rural areas and urban areas in order to explore planning processes suitable to their characteristics respectively, such as the planning practices of Philadelphia for urban areas and British cases for rural areas.

Key words: ecological planning, planning and management, spatial planning

摘要： 在国家空间规划转型的背景下，通过对比英国、美国、德国的绿色基础设施规划案例，探讨适宜中国国情的绿色基础设施或生态空间规划体系。发现：德国绿色基础设施规划流程体系更为完善；美国绿色基础设施规划是在城市更新的背景下发展演化而来的；英国的绿色基础设施规划更注重乡村的地方特色保护。我国地理环境的多样性，城乡结构的复杂性决定我国的绿色基础设施规划需要区别、借鉴国外的体系。主要建议包括：理念上，树立自然资源的综合价值观；体系上，通过借鉴德国绿色基础设施来建构一个以自然资源价值为先导的法律依托，进而在不同层级构建系统的绿色基础设施或生态空间规划体系、方法途径与制图规范；方法上，要区别对待乡村和城市，探索各自适宜的思路与方法体系，如：城市应借鉴美国费城的规划思路，乡村地区则需参考英国案例。

关键词: 生态规划, 规划管理, 空间规划