Post-Use Evaluation of the Changsha South Railway Station Building: Study on Subjective Satisfaction Based on Station Staff and EMU Staff

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2019.01.094

Abstract

Abstract: The post-use evaluation of large-scale high-speed railway stations has been studied for many years now. However, the research is mainly based on passenger evaluations, and the degree of attention from high-frequency groups (i.e. station staff and EMU crew) is relatively insufficient. The Changsha South Railway Station building was selected as a typical evaluation object, and two types of high-frequency users (station staff and EMU crew) were used as the control variables to conduct a satisfaction study. By testing the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, through mean analysis, variance analysis and correlation analysis, it was found that
the subjective evaluations of the two groups have significant differences in terms of overall and multiple factors. The evaluation of the station staff is generally lower than that of the EMU crew, and the large-scaled railway station, especially in relation to how the internal-use space for the employees is set up. Optimization needs to be calculated. Finally, the paper summarizes the outstanding factors and puts forward suggestions for improvement, so as to provide reference for the future design of high-speed-rail passenger stations.

Key words: Changsha South Railway Station, POE, subjective satisfaction, station staff, EMU staff

摘要： 已持续研究多年的大型高铁客站使用后评价多以旅客为研究对象，对高频使用群体——车站员工和动车组司乘人员的关注度相对不足。文章选取长沙南站站房为典型评价客体，以两类高频使用者为控制变量进行满意度研究。在检验了问卷信效度的基础上，通过均值分析、方差分析及相关分析，发现两类群体的主观评价在总体上和在多个因子上存在显著性差异，车站员工的评价普遍低于动车组司乘人员，大型高铁客站特别是员工内部使用空间的设计优化已迫在眉睫。最后，总结问题突出的因子并提出改进建议，为将来的高铁客站设计工作提供参考。

关键词: 长沙南站, 使用后评价, 主观满意度, 车站员工, 动车组司乘人员

CLC Number:

TU025

XIE Yu-hong, CHEN Jian-hua. Post-Use Evaluation of the Changsha South Railway Station Building: Study on Subjective Satisfaction Based on Station Staff and EMU Staff[J]. South Architecture, 2019, 0(1): 94-99.

谢雨宏, 陈建华. 长沙南站站房使用后评价——基于车站员工和司乘人员的主观满意度研究[J]. 南方建筑, 2019, 0(1): 94-99.

References

[1]崔叙,沈中伟,张雪原,等.新型铁路客站规划后评价研究——我国新型铁路客站规划后评价的实证分析与解读[J].南方建筑,2017(1):91-94.
[2]覃玲.高速铁路客运站功能使用后评价研究——以武广长沙南站为例[D].长沙:中南大学,2011.
[3]陈向荣,吴硕贤.基于主观评价法的现代剧场满意度评价——以广州大剧院和湖南大剧院为例[J].华南理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2013,41(10):135-144.
[4]李花芳,张红静.中文版文化价值取向量表信效度检验及其与心理健康的相关性[J].山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017,55(9):122-127.
[5]闫宇翔,许娟,刘佑琴,等.亚健康状态评价问卷的拟定及其信度、效度检验[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2009, 30(6):579-582.
[6]陈希镇.F检验和信度系数α[J].数理统计与管理, 1993(1):37-41.
[7]Gursimran T.,Nicola T.F.,Trudie C. A comparison of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) across different patient populations using Rasch analysis and exploratory factor analysis[J].Journal of Psychosomatic Research,2017,92:45-48.
[8]孟虹,刘阳,张勘,等.用因子分析法分析临床医学中心绩效评价体系的结构效度[J].第二军医大学学报,2007, 28(1):94-97.
[9]牛韶斐,沈中伟,刘少瑜.紧凑城市理念下轨道交通综合体内涵解读[J].南方建筑,2017(2):92-96.
[10]武悦,康健,董诗伟.铁路客站高架式综合候车厅疏散运动时间研究[J].建筑学报,2015(9):100-105.
[11]王晶,曾坚,刘畅.高铁客站与城市公交的一体化衔接模式[J].城市规划学刊,2010(6):68-71.
[12]侯丹,刘刚,王岚,等.线侧式高铁候车空间声环境测评及优化分析[J].建筑学报,2014(S2):32-36.
[13]林炳龙.沪昆高铁引入武广高铁长沙南站武广场信号过渡设计及开通方案研究[J].铁道标准设计,2015,(10):157-162.
[14]王立雄,霍虹光,党睿,等.高铁站候车厅照明调查研究[J].建筑学报,2014(s2):111-115.
[15]Erkan C., Nezir A., Alev T.G. A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul,Turkey[J].Transport Policy,2014(36):283-293.
[16]韩默,庄惟敏.建筑的愉悦与空间满意度评价[J].南方建筑,2017(5):10-14.
[17]马越.广州高校图书馆室内环境评价研究[J].华中建筑,2018,36(8):31-34.
[18]龙泓玥.城市轨道交通进站自动检票机配置优化研究[D].成都：西南交通大学,2017.
[19]郑光复.时尚的两面神——评两铁路新客站,析建筑本质[J].华中建筑,2006,24(10):47-55.
[20]杨永芹.重庆西站实现物业服务一体化[N].重庆日报，2018-01-23(002).
[21]铁道第三勘察设计院.GB50226-2007.铁路旅客车站建筑设计规范[S].中国计划出版社,2011.
[22]马越.基于文本挖掘技术的建成环境使用后评价研究[J].南方建筑,2018(2):96-101.