Study on Spatial Governance of Ecological Risk in Rural Tourism Development: A Case Study of Xinhua Village, Chizhou

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2018.06.066

South Architecture ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 66-72.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2018.06.066

• Urban and Rural Planning • Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on Spatial Governance of Ecological Risk in Rural Tourism Development: A Case Study of Xinhua Village, Chizhou

WANG Min，ZHOU Meng-jie，SONG Yan，WANG Yun-cai

Online:2018-12-29 Published:2019-01-02

乡村旅游发展的生态风险空间管控研究——以池州杏花村为例

王敏1，周梦洁2，宋岩3，王云才4

作者简介:1同济大学建筑与城市规划学院、同济大学建筑与城市规划学院生态智慧与城乡生态实践研究中心、上海城市困难立地绿化工程技术研究中心，副教授；2同济大学建筑与城市规划学院，硕士研究生；3代尔夫特理工大学建筑与建成环境学院，博士研究生；4同济大学建筑与城市规划学院，同济大学建筑与城市规划学院生态智慧与城乡生态实践研究中心，教授，通信作者，电子邮箱：wyc1967@tongji.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划课题（2017YFC0505705）：绿色基础设施生态系统服务功能提升与生态安全格局构建；高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室（同济大学）开放课题（201810405）：基于水生态安全的城市绿色基础设施空间绩效提升技术；住房和城乡建设部软科学研究项目（K22018095）：基于多维数据集成的城市中小河道滨水空间存量更新与生态效应研究。

Abstract

Abstract: As an important measure of the rural revitalization strategy, it is urgently required to solve the complex ecological impact of rural tourism and the developmental puzzle of how to balance the relationships among environmental protection, cultural heritage, economic development, and life improvement. The traditional approach of development at the cost of environmental damage should be abandoned; therefore, Xinghua Village, Chizhou City, Anhui Province, China was selected as the research area and an ecological risk assessment model was constructed via the identification of ecological factors, assessment of ecological sensitivity, and evaluation of ecological vulnerability and ecological interference. Moreover, in this study, spatial control strategies were discussed such as zoning and guiding ecological spatial development, optimizing the value of ecosystem services, and the development control of tourism units based on building the landscape ecological safety pattern. The aim was to discover a scientific route and effective method of space control for rural tourism development utilizing the ecological risk assessment as the access mechanism.

Key words: rural tourism, ecological risk assessment, spatial government, landscape ecological safety pattern, ecosystem service value, development control

摘要： 乡村旅游作为乡村振兴战略的重要抓手，亟待破解由此带来的复杂的生态冲击以及如何平衡环境保护、文化传承与经济发展、生活改善之间关系的发展谜题。摈弃传统的以环境破坏为代价的发展途径，选取中国安徽省池州市杏花村作为研究区域，通过生态要素识别、生态敏感度评价、生态脆弱性分析、生态干扰分析，构建生态风险评价模型，提出景观生态安全格局基础上的生态空间区划与发展引导、生态系统服务价值优化、旅游发展空间单元开发控制等空间管控策略，旨在探讨以生态风险评价作为准入机制的乡村旅游发展空间管控的技术路线与基本方法。

关键词: 乡村旅游, 生态风险评价, 空间管控, 景观生态安全格局, 生态系统服务价值, 开发控制

CLC Number:

TU982.29

WANG Min, ZHOU Meng-jie, SONG Yan, WANG Yun-cai. Study on Spatial Governance of Ecological Risk in Rural Tourism Development: A Case Study of Xinhua Village, Chizhou[J]. South Architecture, 2018, 0(6): 66-72.

王敏, 周梦洁, 宋岩, 王云才. 乡村旅游发展的生态风险空间管控研究——以池州杏花村为例[J]. 南方建筑, 2018, 0(6): 66-72.

References

[1]刘奇.乡村旅游：中国农民的第三次创业[J].中国发展观察，2016（3）：53-56，64.
[2]李创新.美丽乡村：乡村旅游2.0与美丽中国战略的关键[J]. 旅游学刊，2016，31（10）：3-5.
[3]邱玉华，吴宜进.城镇化进程中我国乡村旅游发展的路径选择[J].社会主义研究，2012（1）：101-104.
[4]王云才，刘滨谊.论中国乡村景观及乡村景观规划[J].中国园林，2003（1）：56-59.
[5]刘滨谊,王云才.论中国乡村景观评价的理论基础与指标体系[J].中国园林，2002（5）：77-80.
[6]王敏，侯晓晖，汪洁琼.生态—审美双目标体系下的乡村景观风貌规划：概念框架与实践途径[J].风景园林，2017（6）:95-104.
[7]李莺莉，王灿.新型城镇化下我国乡村旅游的生态化转型探讨[J].农业经济问题，2015（6）：29-34.
[8]黄震方.新型城镇化背景下的乡村旅游发展——理论反思与困境突破[J].地理研究2015（8）：1409-1421.
[9]Mao XL,Ni JR.Recent progress of ecological risk assessment[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium University Pekinensis,2005,41(4):646-654.
[10]Yang W R,Wang R S,Huang J L,et al.Ecological risk assessment and its research progress[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(8):1869-1876.
[11]Lipton J,Galbraith H,Burger J,et al.A Paradigm for Ecological Risk Assessment[J].Environmental Management,1993(17):1-5.
[12]毛小苓，倪晋仁.生态风险评价研究述评[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版)，2015，41（4）：646-654.
[13]彭震伟，王云才，高璟.生态敏感地区的村庄发展策略与规划研究[J].城市规划学刊，2013（3）：7-14.
[14]彭建,党威雄,刘焱序，等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报，2015（4）：664-677.
[15]贾丹.延庆风沙区景观生态风险评价及景观格局优化[D].北京：北京林业大学，2009.
[16]王云才，吕东，彭震伟，等.基于生态网络规划的生态红线划定研究—以安徽省宣城市南漪湖地区为例[J].城市规划学刊，2015（3）：28-35.
[17]程珊珊，沈小雪，柴民伟，等.深圳湾红树林湿地不同生境类型沉积物的重金属分布特征及其生态风险评价[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版)，2018（3）：415-425.
[18]陈卫平，康鹏，王美娥，等.城市生态风险管理关键问题与研究进展[J].生态学报，2018，38（14）：5224-5233.
[19]曾建军，邹明亮，郭建军.生态风险评价研究进展综述[J]. 环境监测管理与技术，2017（2）：1-10.
[20]王敏，王云才.基于生态风险评价的非建设性用地空间管制研究——以吉林长白县龙岗重点片区为例[J].中国园林，2013，29（12）：60-66.
[21]彭震伟，高璟，王云才.生态敏感地区的转型与再生——以《吉林省长白县城乡发展规划》为例[J].小城镇建设，2017(8):13-17.
[22]WANG Yuncai,SHEN Jiake,XIANG Weining.Ecosystem service of green infrastructure for adaptation to urban growth：function and configuration[J].Ecosystem Health and Sustainability,2018(5):1-12.
[23]Egoh B,Rouget M,Reyers B,et al.Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessment:A review[J]. Ecological Economics,2007,63:714-721.
[24]Lautenbach S,Kugel C,Lausch A,et al.Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data[J].Ecological Indicators,2011,11:676-687.
[25]Wainger L A,King D M,Mack R N,et al.Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?[J].Ecological Economics,2010,69:978-987.
[26]李丽，王心源，骆磊，等.生态系统服务价值评估方法综述[J].生态学杂志，2018，37（4）：1233-1245.
[27]谢高地，张彩霞，张雷明，等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[28]吴健生，岳新欣，秦维.基于生态系统服务价值重构的生态安全格局构建——以重庆两江新区为例[J].地理研究.2017，36(3):429-440.
[29]刘旭，赵桂慎，邓永智，等.基于GIS技术的区域生态系统服务价值动态评估方法研究[J].生态经济，2012（1）：375-380.
[30]董锴，侯光辉．城市低碳社区评价指标体系及实证研究——以万科假日风景社区为例[J]．生态经济，2013，264（3）：56-59，76.
[31]王婉飞，吴建兴，吴茂英.乡村旅游发展中地方政府生态管理的驱动因素研究[J].旅游学刊，2018，33（8）：37-47.

Study on Spatial Governance of Ecological Risk in Rural Tourism Development: A Case Study of Xinhua Village, Chizhou

乡村旅游发展的生态风险空间管控研究——以池州杏花村为例

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	ZHOU Jianyun, ZHUO Yuqi, ZENG Xinyi. Research on Urban Skyline Planning and Implementation Control: A case study Based on the Urban Skyline in Shantou [J]. South Architecture, 2023, 0(8): 89-98.
[2]	WU Juanyu, JIANG Weikang, HUANG Yuting . Spatial-Temporal Changes of Ecosystem Service Value in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. South Architecture, 2022, 0(6): 52-61.
[3]	WANG Qinyuan, Ding Jinhua. Rural water network resilience planning Based on landscape ecological risk assessment: A Case Study of Changbaidang [J]. South Architecture, 2022, 0(5): 10-17.
[4]	CAI Xiaobo, PANG Xiaomei, QIU Quan, FANG Libo, LI Wenwei. Research of Development Control Based on Public Health [J]. South Architecture, 2022, 0(1): 34-40.
[5]	WANG Zhi-fang, WANG Si-rui, XU Min. Assessment of Recreation Services at the County-level：A Case Study based on Wusheng City，Sichuan Province [J]. South Architecture, 2020, 0(3): 27-33.
[6]	MA Jia-yi, GAO Li-yuan, LI Zi-yuan, HU Ying-dong. An Analysis of Rural Tourism for the Purpose of Stimulating Communication between Tourists [J]. South Architecture, 2019, 0(1): 121-126.
[7]	Zhang Lin. Coupling Mechanism of Local Culture Heritage and Modern Rural Tourism Development [J]. South Architecture, 2016, 0(4): 15-19.