“一米高度看城市”：儿童友好视角下的综合公园趣味性评价#br#

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2023.05.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 儿童行为心理与活动空间的趣味性息息相关。为了通过对综合公园趣味性评价和分析，丰富儿童视角下的综合公园景观设计策略。综合应用PSPL调研法、行为地图、问卷调查、AHP层次分析等方法，从学龄前儿童行为心理出发，从空间场地、设施小品、植物配置、水景设计、景观文化这5个维度进行评价。得出景观小品和空间场地不够新颖、自然教育科普程度有待提高、互动方式单一。针对问题，提出安全性和儿童共同参与营造的基本原则，以及场地、设施、水景方面的具体优化建议，为儿童友好的综合公园设计优化提供有益借鉴。

关键词: 综合公园, 学龄前儿童, 行为心理, 趣味性, 评价

Abstract: A green space for children's outdoor activities is an important measurement indicator for building a child-friendly city. The construction of child-friendly cities in China has gradually shifted from theoretical research to practical exploration. As an important public space for urban children to have contact with nature and engage in outdoor activities, comprehensive parks should give special consideration to the needs of children. Children's behavioral psychology is closely related to enjoyment in the activity space. Studying the relationship between children's activities and enjoyment of parks from the perspective of behavioral psychology corresponds with the child-friendly city construction principle of "seeing the city from a meter height". This evaluation and analysis of enjoyment in comprehensive parks is expected to provide a useful reference for the design optimization of child-friendly comprehensive parks.
　　Based on determined behavioral and psychological characteristics of preschool children, the factors influencing enjoyment in comprehensive parks are divided into three types according to the behaviors and psychology of preschool children, including the perceptual type, sports type, and social type. Based on relevant studies, 29 representative sample sites were chosen in the Pengpu Four Seasons Park in Shanghai for field survey using the Public Space & Public Life (PSPL) survey method, behavior mapping, questionnaire survey, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and other methods.
　　To screen evaluation factors that influence enjoyment of comprehensive parks, an evaluation model for enjoyment of comprehensive parks was constructed. Enjoyment of comprehensive parks was evaluated from five dimensions, including space, facilities, plant configuration, waterscape design, and landscape culture. Differences in enjoyment among the same type of sample sites were analyzed and problems in enjoyment of comprehensive parks were explored. Finally, the corresponding optimization suggestions were proposed to solve shortcomings—such as the landscape and space sites not being novel enough, the science popularization of natural education needing to be improved, and the existence of single interaction modes—aiming to enrich landscape design strategies of comprehensive parks from the perspective of children.
　　Based on the status and enjoyment evaluation of comprehensive parks, some optimization suggestions were proposed in combination with children's behavioral and psychological needs. Based on the results of a field survey and interviews with parents, the basic principle of children participating in construction under the premise and guarantee of their safety was proposed. It is suggested that children's ideas be incorporated throughout the construction of parks. To better meet the behavioral and psychological needs of children, some specific suggestions to optimize the enjoyment of comprehensive parks were proposed according to the results of evaluating landscape elements in different dimensions. For example, the space site should meet the needs of activities, facilities should cooperate with natural elements, and landscape design should promote perceptional interaction. This study has some innovations: for example, typical sample sites were screened and classified to realize the modularization and visualization of space studies. Furthermore, based on existing studies, the degree of naturalness of materials was introduced into the enjoyment evaluation system of comprehensive parks, which supplements existing studies. However, this study still has some limitations. It is difficult to get rid of subjective factors in surveys of the activity preferences of children. Furthermore, only one park was chosen as the research object, but commonalities and differences in parks in different regions have not been explored deeply. This will be discussed in the next stage.

Key words: comprehensive parks, preschool children, behavioral psychology, enjoyment, evaluation

中图分类号:

韩涵, 于冰沁. “一米高度看城市”：儿童友好视角下的综合公园趣味性评价#br#[J]. 南方建筑, 2023, 0(5): 99-107.

HAN Han, YU Bingqin. "Seeing the City from a Meter Height": Evaluation of Enjoyment of Comprehensive Parks from A Child-friendly Perspective[J]. South Architecture, 2023, 0(5): 99-107.

参考文献

[1]邢子博，张天洁．儿童友好视角下城市公园品质与可达性研究——以巴塞罗那学龄前儿童为例[J]．南方建筑，2021（5）：13-21.
XING Zibo，ZHANG Tianjie．Quality and Accessibility of Urban Parks from a Child-Friendly Perspective：a Case Study of Preschool Children in Barcelona[J].South Architecture, 2021（5）：13-21.
[2]李爽．浅谈儿童友好型公园的规划设计[J].中国园林，2021，37(S1)：80-84.
Li Shuang. Brief Analysis of Planning and Design of Child friendly Parks[J]．Chinese Landscape Architecture，2021，37(S1)：80-84.
[3]仙田满，辛梦瑶.游戏环境的设计方法及其发展[J].世界建筑，2016(11)：27-32.
Mitsuru SENDA，XIN Mengyao，Design Method And Development Of Play Environment[J]. World Architecture，2016(11)：27-32.
[4]魏新月．基于儿童友好型城市视角下的社区公园使用状况评价研究[D].哈尔滨：东北林业大学，2020.
WEI Xinyue. Post Occupancy Evaluation of Community Parks From The Perspective of Child-Friendly City[D]．Harbin：Northeast Forestry University，2020.
[5]陈甜甜，王霞，林广思.我国城市公园儿童游戏场地空间布局演替的类型学研究[J].规划师，2020，36(4)：58-65.
Chen Tiantian，Wang Xia，Lin Guangsi．A Typological Study of Spatial Evolution of Childrens’Playground in Urban Parks[J]．Planners，2020，36(4)：58-65.
[6]HEWITT R J, PERA F A, GARCÍA-MARTÍN M, et al. Mapping Adolescents’ Sense of Place and Perceptions of Change in an Urban-Rural Transition Area[J].Environmental Management,2020,65(3): 334-354.
[7]林芷珊，林广思.基于可供性理论的儿童友好型开放空间研究现状与展望[J].风景园林，2022，29(2)：71-77.
LIN Zhishan, LIN Guangsi, Research Status and Prospects of Child-Friendly Open Spaces Based on Affordance Theory[J]. Landscape Architecture，2022，29(2)：71-77.
[8]李昕．基于儿童行为心理学的重庆儿童公园设计改进研究[D]. 重庆：重庆大学，2016.
Li Xin．A Research of an Optimized Design of Chongqing's Children Park Based on Children's Behavioral Psychology[D]．Chongqing：Chongqing University，2016．
[9]王楠．城市户外儿童游憩空间交互性设计策略探究[J].现代园艺，2020，43(1)：98-100.
Wang Nan．Research on the Interactive Design of Urban Outdoor Children Recreation Space[J]．Contemporary Horticulture，2020，43(1)：98-100．
[10]任鹏．基于认知自然的儿童场地趣味性景观设计研究[D]．咸阳：西北农林科技大学，2016.
Ren Peng. A Study On The Fun Landscape Design Of Field Based On The Children's Understanding Of Nature[D]．Xianyang：Northwest A&F University，2016.
[11]许潇．小学校园空间的趣味性设计研究[J].城市建筑，2019，16(11)：23-24.
Xu Xiao. Study on Interesting Design of Campus Space in Primary Schools[J]．Urbanism and Architecture，2019，16(11)：23-24.
[12]朱爱华．创意趣味性元素在现代景观中的应用——以张唐景观设计项目为例[J].中国花卉园艺，2017(24)：42-43.
ZHU Aihua．The application of creative and interesting elements in modern Landscape：A case study of Z+T Studio’s Design Project[J]. China Flowers & Horticulture，2017(24)：42-43.
[13]梁潇．居住区儿童户外游戏场地趣味性评价研究[D]．上海：上海交通大学，2014.
Liang Xiao．Research Of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (Poe) And Construction Strategies Of The Interestingness Of The Residential Children's Playing Space Landscape[D].Shanghai：Shanghai Jiao Tong University，2014.
[14]周璐.基于打造趣味性儿童活动空间的设计方法研究[J].山西建筑，2020，46（22）：41-43．
ZHOU Lu．Research on design method based on creating an interesting landscape for children’s activities[J].Shanxi Architecture,2020．46（22）：41-43．
[15]朱吉虹，赵越超．基于儿童认知发展的学龄前儿童APP界面交互设计研究[J].包装工程，2020，41(10)：42-48.
ZHU Jihong，ZHAO Yuechao，APP Interface Design for Preschool Children Based on Children’s Cognitive Development[J]. Packaging Engineering，2020，41(10)：42-48.
[16]孟祥庄，李博.谈儿童游戏空间景观趣味性[J].山西建筑，2012，38(24)：7-9.
Meng Xiangzhuang, Li Bo. Discussion on the landscape interesting of children playing space[J].Shanxi Architecture，2012，38(24)：7-9.
[17]赵春丽，杨滨章，刘岱宗．PSPL调研法:城市公共空间和公共生活质量的评价方法——扬·盖尔城市公共空间设计理论与方法探析(3)[J]．中国园林，2012，28(9)：34-38.
ZHAO Chunli, YANG Binzhang, LIU Daizong, PSPL Survey: The Evaluation Method for Quality of Public Space and Public Life：The Study on Jan Gehl's Theory and Method for Public Space Design (Part 3) [J]．Chinese Landscape Architecture，2012，28(9)：34-38.
[18]王腾，茅明睿，崔博庶．规划设计智能化调研工具——“猫眼象限”调研分析系统的特点与应用[J].景观设计学，2019，7(2)：112-120.
Wang Teng，Mao Mingrui，Cui Boshu. Cat's Eye-An Intelligent Investigation Tool For Urban Planning And Design[J]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers，2019，7(2)：112-120.
[19]肖希，韦怡凯，李敏．日本城市绿视率计量方法与评价应用[J]．国际城市规划，2018，33(2)：98-103.
Xiao Xi，Wei Yikai，Li Min．The Method of Measurement and Applications of Visible Green Index in Japan[J].Urban Planning International，2018，33(2)：98-103.
[20]龙学文，陈丹，车生泉．基于GVT的公园游憩偏好分析及管理对策——以上海世纪公园为例[J].中国园林，2020，36(5)：59-63.
Long Xuewen, Chen Dan, Che Shengquan. Park Recreational Preference Analysis and Management Countermeasures Based on GVT-A Case Study of Shanghai Century Park[J]．Chinese Landscape Architecture，2020，36(5)：59-63.
[21]麻彦坤，叶浩生．差异与互补：皮亚杰与维果茨基认知发展观比较的新思考[J].心理科学，2004(6)：1425-1427.
Ma Yankun, Ye Haosheng. Difference and Complement: New Thinking Ab bout the Comparison Between Piaget's and Vygotsky's Views on Cognition Development[J]．Journal of Psychological Science，2004(6)：1425-1427.
[22]玛丽亚米·马格莱克利兹，姜珊，宋阳，等．游乐场树木对儿童游戏行为及健康的影响[J].风景园林，2020，27（9）：63-76.
Mariami Maghlakelidze, Jiang shan, Song Yang, et al．Playground Trees' Impacts on Children's Play Behaviors and Well-being[J]. Landscape Architecture，2020，27（9）：63-76.
[23]王霞，胡心然，乔雪.基于游戏价值的中国城市公园儿童户外游戏空间评价研究[J].风景园林，2022，29(2)：78-83.
Wang Xia，Hu Xinran，Qiao Xue．Research on Evaluation of Children's Outdoor Play Space in Chinese Urban Parks Based on Play Values[J]．Landscape Architecture，2022，29(2)：78-83.
[24]骆天庆，聂浦珍，韩晓蓉.上海滨水绿地美景度与植物多样性的关联研究[J]．园林，2022，39(6)：45-52.
Luo Tianqing，Nie Puzhen，Han Xiaorong．A Case Study in Relationship Between Scenic Beauty and Plant Diversity of Shanghai Waterfront Green Space[J]．Landscape Architecture Academic Journal，2022，39(6)：45-52.
[25]汪芳，王彩霞．学前儿童及其隔代陪护者视角的住区水景研究[J]．中国园林，2015，31(8)：67-71.
Wang Fang，Wang Caixia．Research on Residential Waterscape Based on Preschoolers and Their Grandparents' Perspectives[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture，2015(8)：67-71.
[26]程晓山，朱芸青．广州市儿童公园中植物科普教育类活动项目研究[J]．广东园林，2016，38(5)：4-8.
Cheng Xiaoshan，Zhu Yunqing．Plant Science Educational Activities in Guangzhou Children's Parks[J].Guangdong Landscape Architecture，2016，38(5)：4-8.
[27]丁芹勤，王梦瑶，杨芳绒.城市公园景观趣味性综合评价研究[J].湖北农业科学，2021，60(12)：90-94.
Ding Qinqin，Wang Mengyao，Yang Fangrong．Study on the comprehensive evaluation of urban park landscape interest[J]．Hubei Agricultural Sciences，2021，60(12)：90-94.