南方建筑
• 第五届中国建筑史学国际研讨会论文选 • 上一篇 下一篇
焦 洋
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Jiao Yang
Online:
Published:
摘要： 北宋东京的皇城与宫城一直以来是史学界所关注的热点，关于皇城与宫城的记载见诸于各种历史文献，对于考古成果的认定亦是不尽相同。本文综合运用建筑与历史学方法，通过与唐长安皇城、宫城空间范围与功能布局的比对，提出如下观点，在北宋东京并不存在如唐长安模式的实际意义上的皇城，历史文献中的提及的“宫城”与“皇城”是对同一空间范围的不同称谓。
关键词: 北宋, 东京, 皇城, 宫城, “名”, “实”
Abstract: The imperial city and palace city of Dongjing in North Song Dynasty has been discussed intensely among historians. Different opinions are held based on the archaeological outcomes and historical records. Using architectural and historical methods, and comparing the form and function of the imperial city and palace city with Chang’an in Tang Dynasty, this article puts forward the thesis that during the North Song Dynasty, the true imperial city like Chang’an never existed in Dongjing, so the records of imperial city or palace city should be considered as different name of the same space extent actually.
Key words: North Song Dynasty, Dongjing, imperial city, palace city, form, function
中图分类号:
TU-80
焦 洋. 北宋东京皇城、宫城的“名”与“实”[J]. 南方建筑, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2011.04.072.
Jiao Yang. Research on the Form and Function of the Imperial City and Palace City of Dongjing in North Song Dynasty[J]. South Architecture, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2011.04.072.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://nfjz.arch.scut.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2011.04.072
https://nfjz.arch.scut.edu.cn/CN/Y2011/V0/I4/72
粤ICP备05084312号