南方建筑
• 全国建筑院校论文大赛 • 上一篇 下一篇
朱嘉伊1 陶舒晨2 庞赟俊3
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Zhu Jiayi Tao Shuchen Pang Yunjun
Online:
Published:
摘要: 相比国外较为成熟的教育体制与组织模式,国内城市规划教育经过几十年的发展,现有的部分教学方法呈现出了不同程度的滞后状况。本文以5所英国规划院校为例,挖掘具有特色的教学方法,在知识、技能、实践、价值取向四种课程分类模式下,与国内院校规划专业进行对比。研究结论显示,国内城市规划本科教学方法数量少、方法内涵不一、相对应的评价体系尚显不足。为此本文提出在原有教学方法的基础上,科学合理增加新方法、加快原有方法改革、完善相对应的评价体系等建议。
关键词: 城市规划, 教学方法, 比较, 中英
Abstract: Domestic urban planning education in China has developed for several decades, the teaching methods demonstrate different degree of hysteresis. This paper takes five planning colleges in the UK for example, selects some unique teaching methods, and compares them to the domestic planning colleges with four kinds of course classification models. The research shows that domestic planning teaching methods for undergraduate are limited in typology, different in content and inadequate in evaluation. Considering the foundation for planning education in China, this paper argues that planning colleges in China should add scientific and reasonable methods, speed up reformation of methods and improve the corresponding evaluation system.
Key words: urban planning, teaching method, comparison, Sino-British
中图分类号:
TU984
朱嘉伊 陶舒晨 庞赟俊 . 中英城市规划本科教学方法的比较与启示[J]. 南方建筑, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2013.01.006.
Zhu Jiayi Tao Shuchen Pang Yunjun. Comparison Study for Planning Education in China and the UK[J]. South Architecture, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2013.01.006.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://nfjz.arch.scut.edu.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2013.01.006
https://nfjz.arch.scut.edu.cn/CN/Y2013/V0/I1/6